Re: Why we still see some reports of "could not access transaction

From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why we still see some reports of "could not access transaction
Date: 2004-10-15 16:39:36
Message-ID: ckoug8$6io$1@floppy.pyrenet.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Having seen a couple recent reports of "could not access status of
> transaction" for old, not-obviously-corrupt transaction numbers, I went
> looking to see if I could find a way that the system could truncate CLOG
> before it's really marked all occurrences of old transaction numbers as
> known-dead or known-good.
>
> I found one.
>

Are you going to fix it for the 8.0 and/or back patch it ?

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-10-15 16:48:14 Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-10-15 16:18:44 Re: plperl Safe restrictions