| From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hironobu SUZUKI <hironobu(at)interdb(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgbench - add pseudo-random permutation function |
| Date: | 2021-03-05 14:11:47 |
| Message-ID: | cf552f8b-8835-886b-842f-e96dcac52dbc@pgmasters.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Álvaro,
On 4/2/20 3:01 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2020-Apr-02, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
>>> I'm planning to mark this patch RwF on April 8 and I suggest you
>>> resubmit if you are able to get some consensus.
>>
>> People interested in non-uniform benchmarks would see the point. Why many
>> people would be happy with uniform benchmarks only while life is not uniform
>> at all fails me.
>
> I don't think we should boot this patch. I don't think I would be able
> to get this over the commit line in this CF, but let's not discard it.
As far as I can see you are the only committer who has shown real
interest in this patch. It's been sitting idle for the last year.
What are your current thoughts?
Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Steele | 2021-03-05 14:27:05 | Re: DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY on partitioned index |
| Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2021-03-05 14:06:11 | Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers |