CVS comment

From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: CVS comment
Date: 2004-08-03 16:42:03
Message-ID: ceof9p$h1o$1@floppy.pyrenet.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi all,
I'm reading some comment on CVS and I seen this comment
for tab-complete.c revision 1.109:

Fix subtransaction behavior for large objects, temp namespace, files,
password/group files. Also allow read-only subtransactions of a read-write
parent, but not vice versa. These are the reasonably noncontroversial
parts of Alvaro's recent mop-up patch, plus further work on large objects
to minimize use of the TopTransactionResourceOwner.

but the modification on that file have noting to see with this.

Is it normal ?

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2004-08-03 16:42:04 Re: Anybody have an Oracle PL/SQL reference at hand?
Previous Message Gaetano Mendola 2004-08-03 16:20:15 reindex force