Re: convert libpq uri-regress tests to tap test

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: convert libpq uri-regress tests to tap test
Date: 2022-02-25 13:32:43
Message-ID: cef87a32-2c6b-5aba-1703-04fb0b58e04b@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 24.02.22 16:17, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think that having t/ directories contain only Perl test scripts
> is a good convention that we should stick to. Peter's proposal
> of a separate test/ subdirectory for C test scaffolding is
> probably fine.

I wonder if there are any conventions in the Perl community about where
to put test support files relative to the "t" directory.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2022-02-25 13:33:22 Re: Expose JIT counters/timing in pg_stat_statements
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2022-02-25 13:31:01 Re: Add id's to various elements in protocol.sgml