From: | Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro(dot)yamada(dot)tf(at)nttcom(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP)" <noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: list of extended statistics on psql |
Date: | 2021-01-20 02:35:03 |
Message-ID: | ce64a900-f3d5-771e-58b5-b52ed0834dea@nttcom.co.jp_1 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Tomas,
On 2021/01/19 11:52, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>
>> I'm going to create the WIP patch to use the above queriy.
>> Any comments welcome. :-D
>
> Yes, I think using this simpler query makes sense. If we decide we need something more elaborate, we can improve that by in future PostgreSQL versions (after adding view/function to core), but I'd leave that as a work for the future.
I see, thanks!
> Apologies for all the extra work - I haven't realized this flaw when pushing for showing more stuff :-(
Don't worry about it. We didn't notice the problem even when viewed by multiple
people on -hackers. Let's keep moving forward. :-D
I'll send a patch including a regression test on the next patch.
Regards,
Tatsuro Yamada
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nikita Glukhov | 2021-01-20 02:49:13 | Re: SQL/JSON: functions |
Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2021-01-20 02:28:54 | Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view? |