| From: | bbadour(at)golden(dot)net (Bob Badour) |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL |
| Date: | 2003-10-06 21:59:28 |
| Message-ID: | cd3b3cf.0310061359.6d158071@posting.google.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Anthony W. Youngman" <thewolery(at)nospam(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk> wrote in message news:<xTDLP1CFRIg$Ewjw(at)thewolery(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>...
> In article <3F7F8E1A(dot)474(at)ix(dot)netcom(dot)com>, Lee Fesperman
> <firstsql(at)ix(dot)netcom(dot)com> writes
> >If you don't care for mathematical principles, there's always ad-hoc database
> >models.
> >Check out Pick, OO and XML databases. They're interested in what works and
> >ignore
> >elegance and mathematical principles.
>
> Mathematical principles? You mean like Euclidean Geometry and Newtonian
> Mechanics? They're perfectly solid, good, mathematically correct. Shame
> they don't actually WORK all the time in the real world.
>
> That's what I feel about relational, too ...
That explains the generally poor quality of your posts. You substitute
emotion for reason.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-10-06 22:32:02 | new initdb.c available |
| Previous Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2003-10-06 21:10:08 | Re: psql italian translation |