Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
Cc: Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Date: 2025-12-14 15:19:21
Message-ID: ccssrhafzbp3a3beju3ptyc56a7gbfimj4vwkbokoldofckrc7@bso37rxskjtf
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2025-12-11 22:36:55 +0100, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> I just saw a failure in CI for an unrelated patch,

There are a *lot* of these right now. CI on master currently has a failure
rate of 14 failures / 50 runs on the postgres/postgres repo. All of the
failures are due to this issue from what I can tell. That means there are a
lot of false failures for cfbot.

Could we perhaps disable this test until it's been rewritten to be stable?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2025-12-14 15:27:06 Re: [PATCH] Add pg_lfind8_nonzero()
Previous Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2025-12-14 14:40:25 Don't use the deprecated and insecure PQcancel in our frontend tools anymore