From: | greg(at)turnstep(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Error codes revisited |
Date: | 2003-03-05 14:51:17 |
Message-ID: | cc265fea25d053ab227eeb2fbad5524a@biglumber.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> The *last* thing we need is a half-baked stopgap solution that we'll
> have to be backwards-compatible with forevermore. Fix it right or
> don't do it at all, is MHO.
I agree.
> There is still barely enough time to do the long-threatened protocol
> revision for 7.4, if we suck it up and get started on that now. I've
> been avoiding the issue myself, because it seems generally boring and
> thankless work, but maybe it's time to face up to it?
Definitely. Sure seems to be a lot involved, looking at the TODO page.
Which brings up another question - if a protocol change doesn't warrant
a bump to 8.0, what does? :)
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200303040645
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html
iD8DBQE+ZC1LvJuQZxSWSsgRAkJLAKDUE54ZELrPc4ASqEtwUCk7CYJH/ACfZ7nQ
bLRqMde1T9MDjzmejF+PBis=
=Plww
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2003-03-05 15:18:32 | Re: XML ouput for psql |
Previous Message | Eric D Nielsen | 2003-03-05 14:48:48 | Re: Updateable views... |