On 07.06.23 23:30, Andres Freund wrote:
> Yea, we definitely need the supervisor function in a separate
> process. Presumably that means we need to split off some of the postmaster
> responsibilities - e.g. I don't think it'd make sense to handle connection
> establishment in the supervisor process. I wonder if this is something that
> could end up being beneficial even in the process world.
Something to think about perhaps ... how would that be different from
using an existing external supervisor process like systemd or supervisord.