| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nishant Sharma <nishant(dot)sharma(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Shruthi Gowda <gowdashru(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mahendra Singh Thalor <mahi6run(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [BUG] CRASH: ECPGprepared_statement() and ECPGdeallocate_all() when connection is NULL |
| Date: | 2026-05-06 15:50:04 |
| Message-ID: | cb83c14f-7247-409b-ba5c-04c7402adc6b@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2026-05-06 We 10:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> Attached is a patch with the fix, courtesy of claude. It's a slight
>> behaviour change:
> Yeah. So we could either do something like this, or say that the
> test case is buggy and needs to provide its own mutexes, per the
> existing comment
>
> - * if no connection in TSD for this thread, get the global default
> - * connection and hope the user knows what they're doing (i.e. using
> - * their own mutex to protect that connection from concurrent accesses
>
> On the whole I think I favor the behavior change. We might get some
> complaints, but it just seems a lot safer to redefine it like this.
I agree.
>
> Either way, it seems like some documentation adjustments are called
> for.
>
> As far as the patch itself goes, I'd be inclined to pull the
> preparatory step
>
> ecpg_pthreads_init(); /* ensure actual_connection_key is valid */
>
> into the new ecpg_default_connection() subroutine, especially since
> its proposed comment doesn't mention that prerequisite.
>
>
Right.
Given the lack of field complaints, maybe we should wait until after
next week's releases?
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2026-05-06 15:52:10 | Re: Make printtup a bit faster |
| Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2026-05-06 15:22:47 | Re: Changing the state of data checksums in a running cluster |