Re: connect permission based on database name

From: Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: connect permission based on database name
Date: 2022-05-25 14:38:31
Message-ID: cb6ebae1-2ee9-df60-54b7-00d0f4810850@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 5/25/22 08:20, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rob Sargent<robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Just wondering if I've bumped into some security issue.
>> I'm somewhat surprised that "grant connect to database <dbname>  to
>> <role>" appears to be stored "by name"?
> I think you are forgetting that databases have a default GRANT CONNECT
> TO PUBLIC. You need to revoke that before other grants/revokes will
> have any functional effect.
>
> regards, tom lane
And then the search path is "just a string"?

psql --user oldrole --dbname newdb --host $DBHOST
psql (12.11, server 12.7)
SSL connection (protocol: TLSv1.2, cipher:
ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384, bits: 256, compression: off)
Type "help" for help.

newdb=> show search_path;
    search_path
--------------------
 study, base, public
(1 row)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2022-05-25 14:44:18 Re: connect permission based on database name
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-05-25 14:38:24 Re: existing row not found by SELECT ... WHERE CTID = ?