|From:||Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>|
|To:||Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>|
|Cc:||Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>|
|Subject:||Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox|
On 4/5/17 19:14, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> On 2017-02-28 22:30:16 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2017-02-28 23:42:45 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> On 1/26/17 22:46, Andres Freund wrote:
>>>> On 2016-09-30 15:24:09 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>>> Yeah, I have committed a few of the patches now and I'll close the CF
>>>>> entry now. Thanks for your research.
>>>> Are you planning to push more of these at some point?
>>> Sure, let's take a look.
>> [ partial review ]
> Are you planning to get any of this into v10? There's one or two
> patches here that could qualify as bugfixes (the GinTernary stuff), but
> the rest doesn't strike me as something that should be committed at the
> tail end of the merge window.
I'll keep refining the keywords issue based on your feedback. That
might be something to look into early in PG11.
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
|Next Message||Peter Eisentraut||2017-04-06 18:31:53||Re: Functions Immutable but not parallel safe?|
|Previous Message||Pavel Stehule||2017-04-06 18:19:14||Re: Re: new set of psql patches for loading (saving) data from (to) text, binary files|
|Next Message||Adrian Klaver||2017-04-06 19:51:03||Re: keeping WAL after dropping replication slots|
|Previous Message||David G. Johnston||2017-04-06 16:30:27||Re: WAL being written during SELECT * query|