Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres
Date: 2017-04-06 18:23:47
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On 4/5/17 19:14, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> On 2017-02-28 22:30:16 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2017-02-28 23:42:45 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> On 1/26/17 22:46, Andres Freund wrote:
>>>> On 2016-09-30 15:24:09 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>>> Yeah, I have committed a few of the patches now and I'll close the CF
>>>>> entry now. Thanks for your research.
>>>> Are you planning to push more of these at some point?
>>> Sure, let's take a look.
>> [ partial review ]
> Are you planning to get any of this into v10? There's one or two
> patches here that could qualify as bugfixes (the GinTernary stuff), but
> the rest doesn't strike me as something that should be committed at the
> tail end of the merge window.


I'll keep refining the keywords issue based on your feedback. That
might be something to look into early in PG11.

Peter Eisentraut
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-04-06 18:31:53 Re: Functions Immutable but not parallel safe?
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2017-04-06 18:19:14 Re: Re: new set of psql patches for loading (saving) data from (to) text, binary files

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2017-04-06 19:51:03 Re: keeping WAL after dropping replication slots
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2017-04-06 16:30:27 Re: WAL being written during SELECT * query