| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres |
| Date: | 2017-04-05 23:14:53 |
| Message-ID: | 20170405231453.ecqi2t75hxj3vlsb@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Hi Peter,
On 2017-02-28 22:30:16 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-02-28 23:42:45 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 1/26/17 22:46, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > On 2016-09-30 15:24:09 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > >> Yeah, I have committed a few of the patches now and I'll close the CF
> > >> entry now. Thanks for your research.
> > >
> > > Are you planning to push more of these at some point?
> >
> > Sure, let's take a look.
> [ partial review ]
Are you planning to get any of this into v10? There's one or two
patches here that could qualify as bugfixes (the GinTernary stuff), but
the rest doesn't strike me as something that should be committed at the
tail end of the merge window.
Regards,
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lisandro | 2017-04-05 23:33:25 | Re: Is this pgbouncer configuration suitable for a production environment with hundreds of databases? |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2017-04-05 22:57:26 | Re: Is this pgbouncer configuration suitable for a production environment with hundreds of databases? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-04-05 23:16:40 | Re: LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-04-05 23:10:20 | Re: Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort for describe commands, when size is printed |