| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Use the terminology "WAL file" not "log file" more consistently. |
| Date: | 2022-09-15 10:12:40 |
| Message-ID: | cb64338d-a23e-67a9-8a72-4002013f9211@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On 9/15/22 05:24, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2022-Sep-15, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Yeah, the lowest-tech solution is to accept either spelling of
>> the description string. But I'm not very happy with the whole
>> approach right now. We should have an implementation that isn't
>> dependent on how user-friendly strings are spelled.
>
> We already discussed this, a mere 12 years ago,
> https://postgr.es/m/1283373680-sup-9235@alvh.no-ip.org
> for exactly the same reason.
Nice!
> Let's just do it?
+1
--
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2022-09-15 10:19:25 | Re: pgsql: Use the terminology "WAL file" not "log file" more consistently. |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-09-15 09:24:20 | Re: pgsql: Use the terminology "WAL file" not "log file" more consistently. |