| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded) |
| Date: | 2017-04-16 23:48:36 |
| Message-ID: | cb56e19f-1e3e-00ba-cb98-af370167eb4b@2ndQuadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/16/2017 07:43 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 4/15/17 12:33, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> Sure. Just means putting this code a bit later in the file. "make check"
>> is only one initdb, so it won't cost much. I'm still inclined to force a
>> TAP test for initdb with no TZ set, though.
> How much is this going to buy overall? Is it worth the complications?
>
I don't know, but it's a very small change.
I am going to spend some time instrumenting where the time goes in
various tests.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-04-17 01:59:05 | Re: PANIC in pg_commit_ts slru after crashes |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-04-16 23:48:26 | Re: Comment typo in xlogutils.c |