Re: Voting: "pg_ctl init" versus "initdb"

From: Loyal <lbarbertexas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Voting: "pg_ctl init" versus "initdb"
Date: 2009-11-16 01:06:24
Message-ID: cb27e786-a1ce-4441-bfa8-dba169a694e6@d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Nov 14, 8:07 am, Zdenek(dot)Kot(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)Sun(dot)COM (Zdenek Kotala) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> <snip>
> Because there is doubt if someone else want this I would like to ask
> here for your opinion. There are following options:
>
> 1) Yeah I like pg_ctl init
>
>         "pg_ctl  init" will be preferred method and initdb will
>         disappear from usr/bin in the future.
>
> 2) Good, but keep initdb as well
>
>         pg_ctl init and initdb stays forever
>
> 3) Do not touch my lovely initdb
>
>         pg_ctl init is nonsense, initdb is only correct way.
>
>         Thanks for your response
>
>                 Zdenek
> <snip>

I would be in the group that says 3,2,1. I just don't see a
big advantage to what you are suggesting.

Loyal

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-11-16 01:18:20 Re: Triggering from a specific column update
Previous Message Loyal 2009-11-16 00:42:43 Re: Experience with many schemas vs many databases