Re: [PATCH] Implement uuid_version()

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jose Luis Tallon <jltallon(at)adv-solutions(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement uuid_version()
Date: 2019-07-02 07:26:16
Message-ID: cb0540d0-0d18-922d-fd76-9225524bf715@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-06-30 14:50, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> I'm wondering whether pg_random_uuid() should be taken out of pgcrypto if
> it is available in core?

That would probably require an extension version update dance in
pgcrypto. I'm not sure if it's worth that. Thoughts?

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-07-02 07:28:06 Re: Cache lookup errors with functions manipulation object addresses
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-07-02 07:19:22 Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb