| From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Kincaid <tomjohnkincaid(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Stefan Fercot <stefan(dot)fercot(at)protonmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: post-freeze damage control |
| Date: | 2024-04-11 01:52:00 |
| Message-ID: | cab01e3d-bf5d-4750-b67f-8c1b2f74d6ea@pgmasters.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/11/24 10:23, Tom Kincaid wrote:
>
> The extensive Beta process we have can be used to build confidence we
> need in a feature that has extensive review and currently has no known
> issues or outstanding objections.
I did have objections, here [1] and here [2]. I think the complexity,
space requirements, and likely performance issues involved in restores
are going to be a real problem for users. Some of these can be addressed
in future releases, but I can't escape the feeling that what we are
releasing here is half-baked.
Also, there are outstanding issues here [3] and now here [4].
Regards,
-David
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/590e3017-da1f-4af6-9bf0-1679511ca7e5%40pgmasters.net
[2]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/11b38a96-6ded-4668-b772-40f992132797%40pgmasters.net
[3]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/05fb32c9-18d8-4f72-9af3-f41576c33119%40pgmasters.net#bb04b896f0f0147c10cee944a1391c1e
[4]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/9badd24d-5bd9-4c35-ba85-4c38a2feb73e%40pgmasters.net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-04-11 01:52:59 | Re: Issue with the PRNG used by Postgres |
| Previous Message | Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) | 2024-04-11 01:46:37 | RE: Improve eviction algorithm in ReorderBuffer |