| From: | Doug Bloebaum <blabes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Welty, Richard" <richard(dot)welty(at)bankofamerica(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres? |
| Date: | 2005-11-01 18:22:55 |
| Message-ID: | caa2de8a0511011022t58a5a7a0s4446083a50928900@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 11/1/05, Welty, Richard <richard(dot)welty(at)bankofamerica(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Scott Marlowe writes:
> > and PostgreSQL enjoys a MUCH richer and easier to use
> >set of utilities. I find psql to be much much easier to drive than
> >oracle's SQL*PLus, which makes my head hurt.
>
> i have to use the informix dbaccess tool here at the day job a lot.
> hate it. psql is so much nicer...
>
> i do not have fond memories of SQL*Plus, either.
Yes, sqlplus looks especially bad once you're used to banging around
in psql. Although, I recently discovered rlwrap (a generic readline
wrapper) which makes sqlplus almost tolerable. It's the best thing to
happen to sqlplus since... well, since "quit" I suppose.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Yonatan Ben-Nes | 2005-11-01 18:27:21 | Re: SQL injection |
| Previous Message | A. Kretschmer | 2005-11-01 18:20:14 | Re: replace() and Regular Expressions |