Re: Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog
Date: 2017-02-24 02:56:03
Message-ID: ca7b04cd-8850-7d05-94ae-eb36b84eccbb@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/23/17 8:47 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Anything else than measured in bytes either requires a lookup at the
> file timestamp, which is not reliable with noatime or a lookup at WAL
> itself to decide when is the commit timestamp that matches the oldest
> point in time of the backup policy.

An indication that it'd be nice to have a better way to store this
information as part of a base backup, or the archived WAL files.

> That could be made performance
> wise with an archive command. With pg_receivexlog you could make use
> of the end-segment command to scan the completely written segment for
> this data before moving on to the next one. At least it gives an
> argument for having such a command. David Steele mentioned that he
> could make use of such a thing.

BTW, I'm not opposed to an end-segment command; I'm just saying I don't
think having it would really help users very much.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2017-02-24 02:57:26 Re: btree_gin and btree_gist for enums
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-02-24 02:52:16 Re: Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog