Re: [doc] remove reference to pg_dump pre-8.1 switch behaviour

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [doc] remove reference to pg_dump pre-8.1 switch behaviour
Date: 2020-10-26 07:18:00
Message-ID: ca583d26-6bcf-6081-dc72-f1fcf867e974@iki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 25/10/2020 23:56, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 11:09:26PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> Findings in detail follow.
>
> Are you working on a patch for these ?

I pushed the patch I included in that email now, to remove the most
clear cases. I'm not planning to do anything more right now.

> Otherwise, since I started something similar in April, I could put something
> together based on comments you've gotten here.

That'd be great, thanks!

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2020-10-26 07:49:35 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2020-10-26 04:38:08 Re: Supporting = operator in gin/gist_trgm_ops