| From: | Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Allow a prosupport function to be attached to an aggregate |
| Date: | 2026-08-18 12:36:53 |
| Message-ID: | ca4ee281-f75b-445b-b57f-0b560067c1d7@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 18/08/2026 08:31, Andrei Lepikhov wrote:
> On 18/08/2026 06:56, David Rowley wrote:
>> Is delaying this until v20 fine for you?
> Yes, I can do it manually in pg_catalog for now - rewriting prosupport and
> setting the dependency in the pg_depend. There’s no rush - it’s just about
> keeping things tidy.
However, I noticed that it is not documented yet.
There are also three other prosupport requests that are not documented. A quick
search showed that documentation usually depends on the author, so it makes
sense to add it now.
Since each was introduced at a different time and serves a different purpose, I
suggest we start by documenting SupportRequestSimplifyAggref, as I am more
familiar with it - see the patch in attachment.
--
regards, Andrei Lepikhov,
pgEdge
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v0-0001-Document-the-SupportRequestSimplifyAggref-support.patch | text/plain | 1.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2026-08-18 12:39:42 | Re: basebackup: do not verify checksums on pages written before enabling checksums |
| Previous Message | Ilia Evdokimov | 2026-08-18 12:31:32 | Re: Tracking per-RelOptInfo uniqueness during planning |