Re: Boolean partitions syntax

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net, hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com, dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Boolean partitions syntax
Date: 2018-04-13 09:55:30
Message-ID: ca37d679-014e-1895-e4bc-89b7129ce58b@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Horiguchi-san,

Thanks for the latest patch.

On 2018/04/12 13:12, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> Thank you for verification and the revised patch. The format is
> fine and the fix is correct but I noticed that I forgot to remove
> plural S's from error messages. The attached is the version with
> the fix.

Looking at the gram.y changes in the latest patch, I think there needs to
be some explanatory comments about about the new productions -- u_expr,
b0_expr, and c0_expr.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2018-04-13 09:59:05 Re: Built-in connection pooling
Previous Message amul sul 2018-04-13 08:45:35 Re: wal_consistency_checking reports an inconsistency on master branch