| From: | "Tom Dunstan" <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Bruce Momjian" <momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update: < * Allow adding enumerated values to an existing |
| Date: | 2008-04-25 21:13:33 |
| Message-ID: | ca33c0a30804251413s457e5b08icf3d3ae102e69bea@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Oops, sorry for the crossed emails, slight delay in my main being received.
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 2:18 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I think with something like your 16bit/16bit design, and say ten free
> codes between each original assignment, it'd be okay to not support the
> rewriting stuff at all.
Yeah. I'm more concerned about someone wanting reordering, hence the
second option in my other mail.
Cheers
Tom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-25 21:21:25 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update: < * Allow adding enumerated values to an existing |
| Previous Message | Tom Dunstan | 2008-04-25 21:10:06 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update: < * Allow adding enumerated values to an existing |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-25 21:21:25 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update: < * Allow adding enumerated values to an existing |
| Previous Message | Tom Dunstan | 2008-04-25 21:10:06 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update: < * Allow adding enumerated values to an existing |