From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrey Borodin <amborodin(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, Brad DeJong <Brad(dot)Dejong(at)infor(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. |
Date: | 2017-02-27 13:40:26 |
Message-ID: | ca0cb275-0db1-8a40-c5e5-0a1e55bdd4b9@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/16/17 08:13, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
> @@ -629,7 +630,7 @@ static Node *makeRecursiveViewSelect(char *relname, List *aliases, Node *query);
>
> HANDLER HAVING HEADER_P HOLD HOUR_P
>
> - IDENTITY_P IF_P ILIKE IMMEDIATE IMMUTABLE IMPLICIT_P IMPORT_P IN_P
> + IDENTITY_P IF_P ILIKE IMMEDIATE IMMUTABLE IMPLICIT_P IMPORT_P IN_P INCLUDE
> INCLUDING INCREMENT INDEX INDEXES INHERIT INHERITS INITIALLY INLINE_P
> INNER_P INOUT INPUT_P INSENSITIVE INSERT INSTEAD INT_P INTEGER
> INTERSECT INTERVAL INTO INVOKER IS ISNULL ISOLATION
I think your syntax would read no worse, possibly even better, if you
just used the existing INCLUDING keyword.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-02-27 13:48:26 | Re: Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm. |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-02-27 13:38:04 | Re: bytea_output output of base64 |