| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Gasper Zejn <zejn(at)owca(dot)info>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pglz performance |
| Date: | 2019-11-06 08:03:48 |
| Message-ID: | c9adbdc6-3e41-728c-71ce-1be3ec951a56@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-11-01 16:48, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> As I understand that report, in these results "less is better", so the
> hacked8 variant shows better performance (33.8) than current (42.5).
> The "hacked" variant shows worse performance (48.2) that the current
> code.
Which appears to be the opposite of, or at least inconsistent with,
results earlier in the thread.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-11-06 08:04:25 | Re: pglz performance |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-11-06 07:56:00 | Re: Checking return value of SPI_execute |