Re: Cleanup shadows variable warnings, round 1

On 28.11.25 09:16, Chao Li wrote:
> Hi Hackers,
>
> While reviewing [1], it makes me recall an experience where I had a
> patch ready locally, but CommitFest CI failed with a shadows-variable
> warning. Now I understand that -Wall doesn't by default enable -Wshadows
> with some compilers like clang.
>
> I did a clean build with manually enabling -Wshadow and
> surprisingly found there are a lot of such warnings in the current code
> base, roughly ~200 occurrences.
>
> As there are too many, I plan to fix them all in 3-4 rounds. For round 1
> patch, I'd see any objection, then decide if to proceed more rounds.

See
<https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20220817145434.GC26426%40telsasoft.com>
for a previous long thread on this, which led to the addition of the
-Wshadow=compatible-local flag.

I think this is a slightly unsatisfactory state, because that is a
gcc-specific option, and maybe you are using clang or something else.
So maybe some further cleanup is useful, but please check the previous
discussions.