From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ian Barwick <ian(dot)barwick(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add %r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status) |
Date: | 2018-01-10 17:28:57 |
Message-ID: | c96ea34f-1bbc-71e8-9330-3a1ff7201627@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/10/2018 09:22 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> ... but I don't think it fixes that, because you couldn't send this new
> request without making an assumption about the server version being
> new enough to support it. My entire beef with making server_version_num
> be GUC_REPORT is that it would encourage people to write client code that
> fails outright against older servers. I'm afraid what you are suggesting
> will be an equally attractive nuisance.
It seems to me that is not our problem. Why do we care if some developer
says, "I only work with 9.6"? If I am understanding your complaint.
JD
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc
PostgreSQL centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://postgresconf.org
***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bossart, Nathan | 2018-01-10 17:30:18 | Re: BUG #14941: Vacuum crashes |
Previous Message | Bossart, Nathan | 2018-01-10 17:26:43 | Re: BUG #14941: Vacuum crashes |