Re: Reorganize GUC structs

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reorganize GUC structs
Date: 2025-11-12 08:41:07
Message-ID: c8e0411b-6d99-4254-aeb5-15a6245f0db2@eisentraut.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 07.11.25 16:53, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2025-Nov-07, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>> Actually, the ", " already exists in the message catalog, so adding a
>> comment here might confuse the other site.
>
> This one?
> #: replication/logical/relation.c:245
> #, c-format
> msgid ", \"%s\""
> msgstr ", »%s«"
>
> It's different. (And warrants a comment too, IMO)

Well, that's the one, but the code actually looks like this now:

while ((i = bms_next_member(atts, i)) >= 0)
{
attcnt++;
if (attcnt > 1)
appendStringInfoString(&attsbuf, _(", "));

appendStringInfo(&attsbuf, _("\"%s\""), remoterel->attnames[i]);
}

The catalog entries you are showing appear to be from pre-PG18.

There are also similar instances in ExecBuildSlotValueDescription() that
are not marked up for gettext but perhaps should be. There might be
others, and I would expect more like this to appear over time, as people
like to add more detail like this to diagnostics messages.

Do you have a suggestion what kind of comment to attach there?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Man Zeng 2025-11-12 08:45:16 Re: Extended Statistics set/restore/clear functions.
Previous Message Chao Li 2025-11-12 08:40:34 Re: Make PQgetResult() not return NULL on out-of-memory error