Re: WIP: BRIN multi-range indexes

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: BRIN multi-range indexes
Date: 2021-03-26 14:04:45
Message-ID: c8cee470-b685-cbb1-1eee-005a7aae6349@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/26/21 2:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> I recall seeing "bus error" on sparc with other patches because of
>> alignment issues, so I wonder if this is what's happening here.
>
> Try compiling with the address sanitizer enabled. Per c.h,
>
> * Testing can be done with "-fsanitize=alignment -fsanitize-trap=alignment"
> * on clang, or "-fsanitize=alignment -fno-sanitize-recover=alignment" on gcc.
>

Bingo! I see the one failing x86_64 machine has -fsanitize=alignment.

thanks

--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2021-03-26 14:19:04 Re: invalid data in file backup_label problem on windows
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-03-26 13:55:38 Re: WIP: BRIN multi-range indexes