Re: BUG: Former primary node might stuck when started as a standby

From: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
Subject: Re: BUG: Former primary node might stuck when started as a standby
Date: 2026-03-02 07:00:00
Message-ID: c7284102-01fb-4704-8a80-8e65f59fa933@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dear Kuroda-san,

[ back to -hackers after short off-list discussion ]

20.02.2026 04:00, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
>
> Please look at the attached self-contained script. It works for me (failed
> on iterations 6, 12, 2 right now, on my workstation with Ryzen 7900X) --
> probably you could adjust number of parallel jobs to reproduce it on your
> hardware.
>

As it turned out, v2 patch works as expected, but the test may still fail
when the build is configured without injection points. Maybe this test (
and similar one(s)) should be skipped in this case, not sure...

Best regards,
Alexander

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Soumya S Murali 2026-03-02 07:02:09 Re: [Patch]Add tab completion for DELETE ... USING
Previous Message Alexander Pyhalov 2026-03-02 06:44:46 Re: Asynchronous MergeAppend