Re: Function scan FDW pushdown

From: Alexander Pyhalov <a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: solaimurugan vellaipandiyan <drsolaimurugan(dot)v(at)gmail(dot)com>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, g(dot)kashkin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Function scan FDW pushdown
Date: 2026-08-17 06:57:08
Message-ID: c6de48bf1f09e2c1a22b5f680d4d9099@postgrespro.ru
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alexander Korotkov писал(а) 2026-08-15 03:49:
> Hi!
>
>> Hi. I've updated comment a bit, as we currently have to handle NULL
>> records correctly,
>> this is not a nice-to-have feature which we need for future changes to
>> be more safe.
>
> Thank you. I've further improved that comment. Also, I've revised the
> cost calculation in init_func_stub_fpinfo() to reflect the cost of the
> function execution on the remote side. I have to edit the regression
> test query to reliably exercise the pushdown.
>
> ------
> Regards,
> Alexander Korotkov
> Supabase

Hi.
Looks good to me.
--
Best regards,
Alexander Pyhalov,
Postgres Professional

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2026-08-17 06:57:31 Re: Failing assertion while taking a restartpoint during crash recovery
Previous Message Yugo Nagata 2026-08-17 06:54:07 Re: Rename EXISTS-to-ANY converted subplan to exists_to_any