Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12
Date: 2018-03-29 00:59:56
Message-ID: c6221028-5ec2-d37c-39ae-df41c1806971@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018/03/29 9:35, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 06:24:53PM -0400, David Steele wrote:
>> On 3/28/18 6:09 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> Hah! Happy to, if there's enough people interested. I've a talk about
>>> it too (state of jit, 2018 edition), but I wasn't planning to go into
>>> too low level details. More about what is good, what is bad, and how we
>>> make it better ;)
>>
>> +1 for an unconference session. This is some seriously cool stuff.
>
> Take room for two sessions then, with a break in-between to give enough
> time to people to recover from the damage of the first session :)
>
> Jokes apart, an unconference session at PGcon would be great.

+1

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-03-29 01:03:28 Re: Changing WAL Header to reduce contention during ReserveXLogInsertLocation()
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2018-03-29 00:59:05 Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification