From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: New docs chapter on Transaction Management and related changes |
Date: | 2022-11-09 08:12:43 |
Message-ID: | c6207dd8013c0efb6258939a684a8b52273a4b2f.camel@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 22:43 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I thought some more about the patch, and I don't like the title
> > "Transaction Management" for the new chapter. I'd expect some more
> > from a chapter titled "Internals" / "Transaction Management".
> >
> > In reality, the new chapter is about transaction IDs. So perhaps the
> > name should reflect that, so that it does not mislead the reader.
>
> I renamed it to "Transaction Processing" since we also cover locking and
> subtransactions. How is that?
It is better. Did you take my suggestions from [1] into account in your
latest cumulative patch in [2]? Otherwise, it will be difficult to
integrate both.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
[1]: https://postgr.es/m/3603e6e85544daa5300c7106c31bc52673711cd0.camel%40cybertec.at
[2]: https://postgr.es/m/Y2nP04/3BHQOviVB%40momjian.us
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-11-09 08:20:50 | Re: security_context_t marked as deprecated in libselinux 3.1 |
Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2022-11-09 06:41:23 | Re: logical replication restrictions |