From: | Ildar Musin <i(dot)musin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: General purpose hashing func in pgbench |
Date: | 2018-03-14 12:30:46 |
Message-ID: | c5c0366e-6d66-df0e-a54f-a16081d582c5@postgrespro.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Teodor,
On 07.03.2018 16:21, Ildar Musin wrote:
> Turned out that the only big-endian machine I could run test on is
> out of order.
I finally managed to perform this test on sparc v9 machine which is 64
bit big-endian architecture. I run pgbench script (see previous message)
with default_seed=123 on both x86-64 and sparc machines and visualized
the results. You can find them in the attached chart. Both images showed
the same distribution. So endianness isn't a concern here.
Thanks!
--
Ildar Musin
i(dot)musin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
image/png | 46.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-03-14 13:07:06 | Re: PATCH: Unlogged tables re-initialization tests |
Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2018-03-14 12:25:03 | Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold. |