Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.

From: Andrey Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>, movead li <movead(dot)li(at)highgo(dot)ca>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.
Date: 2020-06-03 10:00:06
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/30/20 1:15 PM, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> Hi,
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 10:47 AM movead li <movead(dot)li(at)highgo(dot)ca> wrote:
>> I redo the make installcheck-world as Kyotaro Horiguchi point out and the
>> result nothing wrong. And I think the patch is good in feature and performance
>> here is the test result thread I made before:
>> The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer
> As discussed upthread, this is a material for PG14, so I moved this to
> the next commitfest, keeping the same status. I've not looked at the
> patch in any detail yet, so I'm not sure that that is the right status
> for the patch, though. I'd like to work on this for PG14 if I have
> time.

This patch no longer applies cleanly.
In addition, code comments contain spelling errors.

Andrey Lepikhov
Postgres Professional
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2020-06-03 10:20:47 Re: Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2020-06-03 09:13:00 Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions