Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE

From: Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE
Date: 2016-03-22 21:04:49
Message-ID: c5967360-af56-4574-92dc-62f20c694b98@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I was not sure about the syntax, so this was a prototype. Now, like all
completed yet.

>
> 1) I think this syntax is wrong... Instead the common should be:
>
> PREPARE [IF NOT EXISTS] ...
You right. Done.

> 2) All of CINE statements we emit a NOTICE skipping message, so you should
> emit a message like it:
Done.

> 3) There are no regression tests
Done.
> 4) There are no docs
Done.

Regards.

--
Yury Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
if_not_exists_for_prepare_v3.patch text/x-patch 5.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-03-22 21:09:52 Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-03-22 20:53:28 Re: WIP: Access method extendability