Re: logical replication and PANIC during shutdown checkpoint in publisher

From: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logical replication and PANIC during shutdown checkpoint in publisher
Date: 2017-04-14 19:11:02
Message-ID: c50df037-de6a-2498-0ae4-eb8a957db85b@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 14/04/17 21:05, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 4/14/17 14:23, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> Ah yes looking at the code, it does exactly that (on master only). Means
>> that backport will be necessary.
>
> I think these two sentences are contradicting each other.
>

Hehe, didn't realize master will be taken as master branch, I meant
master as in not standby :)

--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-04-14 19:20:33 Re: Some thoughts about SCRAM implementation
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-04-14 19:05:13 Re: logical replication and PANIC during shutdown checkpoint in publisher