Re: IO in wrong state on riscv64

From: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, greg(at)burd(dot)me
Subject: Re: IO in wrong state on riscv64
Date: 2025-10-13 04:00:00
Message-ID: c4cf94c2-e61c-444b-814f-1df85e52a39f@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

13.10.2025 01:44, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2025 at 6:00 PM Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Please find those attached (gdb "disass/m pgaio_io_update_state" misses
>> the start of the function (but it's still disassembled below), so I
>> decided to share the whole output).
> Could you please also disassemble pgaio_io_reclaim()?

Sure, the output of disass/m pgaio_io_reclaim is attached.

A side note: I could not reproduce the hang so far — 8 out of 30
iterations of 027_stream_regress failed, but all completed within
700-800 seconds.

Best regards,
Alexander

Attachment Content-Type Size
pgaio_io_reclaim.asm text/plain 28.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chao Li 2025-10-13 04:01:01 Re: Improve docs for n_distinct_inherited
Previous Message David Rowley 2025-10-13 03:48:42 Re: Improve docs for n_distinct_inherited