| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Identity columns should own only one sequence |
| Date: | 2019-08-06 09:54:14 |
| Message-ID: | c4b9f8af-2992-cca7-d99c-3afabb01d982@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-08-05 13:30, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 2019-05-08 16:49, Laurenz Albe wrote:
>>> I believe we should have both:
>>>
>>> - Identity columns should only use sequences with an INTERNAL dependency,
>>> as in Peter's patch.
>>
>> I have committed this.
>
> Since this is a bug fix, shouldn't it be backpatched?
In cases where the workaround is "don't do that then", I'm inclined to
leave it alone.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ibrar Ahmed | 2019-08-06 10:26:36 | Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges? |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-08-06 09:49:13 | Update to DocBook 4.5 |