Re: Use %u to print user mapping's umid and userid

From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Use %u to print user mapping's umid and userid
Date: 2016-05-13 07:00:31
Message-ID: c3d58c57-a508-f9ba-5499-a0c6b7b94932@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016/05/13 3:53, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Regardless of what approach we take, I disagree that this needs to be
>> fixed in 9.6.

> Agreed. This is only a cosmetic issue, and it's only going to be visible
> to a very small group of people, so we can leave it alone until 9.7.

Agreed.

> (FWIW, now that we've put in the list_make5 macros, I'd vote against
> taking them out, independently of what happens in postgres_fdw.
> Somebody else will need them someday, or indeed might already be
> using them in some non-core extension.)

Agreed.

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-05-13 07:26:41 Re: Error during restore - dump taken with pg_dumpall -c option
Previous Message George Neuner 2016-05-13 06:49:36 Re: NULL concatenation