Re: non-bulk inserts and tuple routing

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: non-bulk inserts and tuple routing
Date: 2018-02-19 04:19:10
Message-ID: c3b19f9d-dfc0-12b0-7bd3-cb38aa86d4f5@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Fujita-san,

On 2018/02/16 19:50, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> (2018/02/16 18:23), Amit Langote wrote:
>> Good idea. Done.
> Thanks.  I fixed a typo (s/Converti/Convert/) and adjusted these comments
> a bit further to match the preceding code/comments.  Attached is the
> updated version.

Thank you for updating the patch.

>> Updated patch attached.
>
> Thanks, I think the patch is in good shape, so I'll mark this as ready for
> committer.

Thanks a lot for reviewing!

Attached rebased patch.

Regards,
Amit

Attachment Content-Type Size
v11-0001-During-tuple-routing-initialize-per-partition-ob.patch text/plain 22.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2018-02-19 04:26:35 Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2018-02-19 04:05:54 Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions