Re: full disjunction in press kit for 8.2

From: usleepless(at)gmail(dot)com
To: poppcorn(at)cornelia-boenigk(dot)de
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: full disjunction in press kit for 8.2
Date: 2006-10-14 21:19:29
Message-ID: c39ec84c0610141419y63f650beta06b2d0303a820be@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Hi,

On 10/14/06, Cornelia Boenigk <poppcorn(at)cornelia-boenigk(dot)de> wrote:
> Hi Josh
>
> > PostgreSQL 8.2 does support full disjunctions via a Pgfoundry project:
> >
> > http://pgfoundry.org/projects/fulldisjunction/
>
> Should'nt this be mentioned as such? It looks like PG would support it
> natively.

furthermore, i feel that their is a lack of information on these
pages. although i am pretty familiair with databases and know what
joins are, what inner joins are, what left and right outer joins
are... and let's not forget natural joins btw :-)

i am unsure what full disjunctions are. i can do an educated guess
which is probably right, but... is the target audience aware?

in fact i found no information except "The full-disjunction operation
is a variation of the join operator that maximally combines tuples
from connected relations, while preserving all information in the
relations. Useful for integrating heterogeneous data sources (web
sources). BSD License."

i guess i have to download it to find more documentation?

at least, there should be an example somewhere on these pages.

"yeah... well... you know that is just like ehhh... your opinion man"
(The Dude)

take it anyway you would like,

regards,

usleep

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lukas Kahwe Smith 2006-10-15 07:02:54 Re: PostgreSQL rebranding
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-10-14 21:07:35 Re: PostgreSQL rebranding