Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Date: 2024-02-28 21:50:23
Message-ID: c358c735-2f84-3b2a-6e65-4fb76834c116@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2024-02-28 We 09:05, Jacob Champion wrote:
>
> Daniel and I discussed trying a Python version of the test server,
> since the standard library there should give us more goodies to work
> with. A proof of concept is in 0009. I think the big question I have
> for it is, how would we communicate what we want the server to do for
> the test? (We could perhaps switch on magic values of the client ID?)
> In the end I'd like to be testing close to 100% of the failure modes,
> and that's likely to mean a lot of back-and-forth if the server
> implementation isn't in the Perl process.

Can you give some more details about what this python gadget would buy
us? I note that there are a couple of CPAN modules that provide OAuth2
servers, not sure if they would be of any use.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2024-02-28 21:52:40 Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Previous Message Andrew Atkinson 2024-02-28 21:43:27 Re: An improved README experience for PostgreSQL