Re: [PATCH] Reject ENCODING option for COPY TO FORMAT JSON

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reject ENCODING option for COPY TO FORMAT JSON
Date: 2026-05-30 13:20:16
Message-ID: c347fbce-ff41-40af-bcd5-47fbd6cfd04f@dunslane.net
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2026-05-04 Mo 10:43 AM, Ayush Tiwari wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 4 May 2026 at 19:49, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
> Basically good, I think. I have modified your test a bit, testing
> more directly for the presence of the LATIN-1 encoded character
> and the absence of the UTF-8 encoded character, by reading in the
> file with pg_read_binary_file, and adding a test for implicit
> encoding by setting client_encoding.
>
>
> The revised tests look better to me.  Checking the raw bytes with
> pg_read_binary_file() directly verifies that LATIN1 output does not
> contain
> the UTF-8 sequence, and the added implicit client_encoding case too
> looks good.
>
> Thanks for improving the test coverage.
>
>

pushed.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2026-05-30 13:21:21 Re: Avoid leaking system path from pg_available_extensions
Previous Message Ilmar Y 2026-05-30 12:14:33 Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_policy_ddl() function to reconstruct CREATE POLICY statement