From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: ECPG bug fix: DECALRE STATEMENT and DEALLOCATE, DESCRIBE |
Date: | 2021-08-09 21:48:07 |
Message-ID: | c340d106692e0bf881c14a205ded9c4ad8cead4e.camel@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > > I don't want to upset anybody for any reason. I regret that my
> > > words
> > > have upset you, but I think that they were misinterpreted in a
> > > way
> > > that I couldn't possibly have predicted. The particular aspect of
> >
> > I strongly object to that. It's pretty obvious to me that
> > addressing
> > people in third person is very offending.
>
> So, you object to him referring to you in the third person in an
> email,
> and you object to him saying it was "misinterpreted". Are you going
> to
> object to my email too?
No, of course not. And sorry for not being precise enough, I only
objected to the prediction part, but I agree, I take the objection
back. I guess it's as difficult for Peter to understand why this is
offensive as it is for me to not see it as such.
> I think it might have been in the third person because at that point,
> Peter didn't expect a reply from you, and put you on the "TO" line
> merely as a courtesy. He could have put out an email about reverting
> the patch without you on the email header at all, I guess --- then he
> could have referred to you without offending you.
Right, that was my only problem originally. It seemed difficult to
bring that point over.
> Let me be practical here --- the more someone has to be chased for a
> reply, the less confidence they have in that person. If the RMT
> contacts you about something, and obviously they have had to take
> usual
> efforts to contact you, the more it is on you to give a full report
> and
> a timeline of when you will address the issue. If they had to chase
> you
> around, and you gave them a short answer, the less confidence they
> have
> in this getting resolved in a timely manner.
Again agreed, please keep in mind, though, that I didn't notice I was
being chased until Peter's first email.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De
Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-08-09 22:00:00 | Re: ECPG bug fix: DECALRE STATEMENT and DEALLOCATE, DESCRIBE |
Previous Message | Michail Nikolaev | 2021-08-09 21:45:17 | Re: Slow standby snapshot |