Re: plpgsql CASE statement - last version

From: "Jaime Casanova" <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plpgsql CASE statement - last version
Date: 2008-05-01 13:11:24
Message-ID: c2d9e70e0805010611x7dd07464l88e790ff398acc3f@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello
>
> 2008/5/1 Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> > On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> Hello
> >>
> >> I found some bugs when I used base_lexer, so I returned back own
> >> lexer. It's only little bit longer, but simpler.
> >>
> >
> > you really compile this one? i get a complain because
> > read_sql_construct is called with 8 arguments and it should have only
> > 7..
>
> yes, I did it. 8 arguments are from EXECUTE USING patch
> http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/pl/plpgsql/src/gram.y.diff?r1=1.108;r2=1.109;f=h
>

so, i need to see that patch first? patch that doesn't apply because
of changes in files (specially definitions moved to other files, but i
haven't checked all the .rej yet)

--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte de PostgreSQL
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. (593) 087171157

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2008-05-01 13:14:35 Re: plpgsql CASE statement - last version
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2008-05-01 12:59:22 Re: plpgsql CASE statement - last version