Re: insert/update/delete returning and rules

From: "Jaime Casanova" <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Pgsql Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: insert/update/delete returning and rules
Date: 2006-08-15 20:13:25
Message-ID: c2d9e70e0608151313x4b9f1a55t29eb571dff5fb3bb@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/15/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Jaime Casanova" <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I'm doing some tests of Bernd's updatable views patch and found
> > something interesting about the RETURNING behavior
> > ...
> > but if i insert using the rules the returning clause is ignored
> > testing_uv=# insert into v_bar values (3), (4) returning *;
> > INSERT 0 2
>
> What are you testing exactly? I think this recent fix might be
> relevant:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2006-08/msg00299.php
>

i have tested again against current HEAD... what i do is to create a
table and then a view against that table... then the rules... you can
use the exact case i posted earlier...

then the insert into view (view + rules defined on it) returning will
not have the same behavior that insert into table...

--
regards,
Jaime Casanova

"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proof programs and the universe trying
to produce bigger and better idiots.
So far, the universe is winning."
Richard Cook

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-08-15 20:33:27 Re: insert/update/delete returning and rules
Previous Message korryd@enterprisedb.com 2006-08-15 20:12:33 Re: [PATCHES] PL instrumentation plugin and Rendezvous variable