Re: someone working to add merge?

From: Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: someone working to add merge?
Date: 2005-11-11 17:15:58
Message-ID: c2d9e70e0511110915o2a165a4pf6e83ef852b6e06@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/11/05, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Jaime,
>
> > so i suppose we can reuse many of the code breaking the merge in 3
> > pieces... for now they are just thougths, i will think more in this
> > and try to implement it...
> >
> > comments? ideas? suggestions?
>
> Funny, we were just discussing this at OpenDBCon. Seems that you can't do a
> full implementation of MERGE without Predicate Locking (the ability to say
> "lock this table against inserts or updates of any row with key=5").

it isn't what select for update does?

> However, Peter suggested that we could do a proof-of-concept implementation,
> working out syntax and trigger issues, based on a full table lock and do the
> hard work once it was proved to be feasable.
>
> Peter?
>
> --
> Josh Berkus
> Aglio Database Solutions
> San Francisco
>

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
(DBA: DataBase Aniquilator ;)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-11-11 17:26:54 Re: someone working to add merge?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2005-11-11 17:09:45 Re: someone working to add merge?