Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning

From: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning
Date: 2017-12-12 10:34:53
Message-ID: c1429c52-bd50-ca95-82f4-dbb1304712b7@redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Beena,

On 12/07/2017 02:22 AM, Beena Emerson wrote:
> I have added the partition quals that are used for pruning.
>
> PFA the updated patch. I have changed the names of variables to make
> it more appropriate, along with adding more code comments and doing
> some refactoring and other code cleanups.
>

As the current patch conflicts with [1] could you provide a rebased
version ?

Thanks in advance !

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/9b98fc47-34b8-0ab6-27fc-c8a0889f2e5b%40lab.ntt.co.jp

Best regards,
Jesper

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2017-12-12 11:21:06 Re: Fwd: [BUGS] pg_trgm word_similarity inconsistencies or bug
Previous Message Kuntal Ghosh 2017-12-12 10:30:39 Re: Parallel Index Scan vs BTP_DELETED and BTP_HALF_DEAD